Baquero, Bravo, Calderón, Ramirez
Abstract
In the Europe of the 19th century, there was a transformation of the State-Nation and so taking into account the international system that in one way or another has been reflected in facts such as the discovery of new routes, allowed the greatest flow in trade and in the reduction of the risks themselves, also allowing the activation of trade by new routes of the Indian Ocean, because Europe exercised greater demand and pressure on trade. The war managed to boost the political system and the distribution of power in the state.
Considering the international system and the European influence in the world for what the nineteenth century was and its transformation to a nation-state. But what is the relevant ‘society’? For Rawls, ‘society’ is defined in terms of nation-state. Each nation-state forms one (and only one) society, and Rawls theory applies within the boundaries of each nation-state (Rauls, 2003). There is a need to take into account the variables that make up the relations of the different nation states today and how these have influenced the current international system, with the help of organizations and organizations that see the proper functioning of world relations.
This means that international development cooperation, on the other way, is going through a period of transformation and change in which an important revision of its foundations, objectives and instruments is taking place. This reform process is the result of the modifications that international society is undergoing. (Sanahuja, 1999, p. 11).
Facts such as the discovery of new routes, allowed the greater flow in trade and the reduction of the risks themselves, allowing the activation of trade along the Cape of Good Hope route located in southern Africa, reaching the Indian trade routes. This episode was considered successful, so the Portuguese opened regular shipping on the Cape to Indian Ocean route, trafficking spices and other luxury goods for European demand (Hausberger, 2018). Europe exerted greater demand and pressure on trade. So this marked the beginning of the expansion of trade and world routes to globalization. The war not only boosted the system of states, but also the distribution of power in the state (Villa, 2012).
These new routes in its role as an innovative actor, he aims to contribute to development (Bastiaensen, 2015). They allowed to see with another face the development between nations, generating a change through trade, stimulating society to advance. They have never entertained any doubt that the information-driven transition leading to an economy without borders is not going to question the relevance of nation-states as significant units of economic activity (Ohmae, 1997). Likewise, “Given that member States may be bound by positions taken by the Community, it is necessary to determinate what, exactly, is the extent of the binding” (Koskenniemi, 1998, p.165).
That is how the international economic system, in which States draw the border between the internal economy and foreign trade relations. Hill (2004) affirms:
The subject is still a relatively neglected one, even if there has been a greater acknowledgement in recent years of the need for specialists in International Relations (IR) to incorporate European Union (EU) external relations, and not just the integration process, into their theoretical schemes and empirical pictures of the world. (p.5)
Using different means to the war and violence of the European colonizers, said gave a part of hope where the term nation-state would give power and voice to the people. The democratic constitutional state also guarantees equality before the law, in the sense that all citizens must have an equal opportunity to exercise their rights (Habermas, 1999). Therefore, trade was and is a future for society, which regrettably in some periods of time it had ups and downs for reasons such as poor organization and disagreements. Responsibility of International Organizations (IO’s) is a topic enveloped in some sort of mystery in particular because of the reluctance of the International Law Comission (ILC) to suarely face the issues relating thereto (Cannizaro, 2013).
However, this economic boom had a notable decrease since wars were unleashed in the 20th century that faded opportunities for peace and economic growth, such as the Cold War. A brief history of the conflict that dominated, and largely determined, international affairs for nearly half a century has been as challenging as it is overwhelming (McMahon, 2009). Even so, the social world in one way or another manages to get ahead of each of these ups and downs mainly due to globalization. Globalization as the convergence of humanity towards a future of solidarity, and that many critics of this process read this torn passage as the process by which we will all end up homogenized (Canclini, 1999). Globalization comes to be understood as union.
That is why for the 21st century it can once again be said that this gave way to relative peace (Caceres, 2001). A respite of peace, where an international system is established and established which will oversee maintaining order in social relations between nation-states. Like these: New international actors and new subjects of international law who are involved in the international system (Restrepo Vélez, 2013). These will oversee governing the proper functioning, control, regulation and relations between countries that have led up to know to what we know as globalization.
The capitalist system, which ultimately consists of the acceptance of the allocation of resources through the market as a basic organizational, functional and normative principle, is giving rise, within the same integrated world system, to very disparate developments in different contexts. originals. (Jose de Acosta, 2000, p.204)
In conclusion, trade has allowed the formation of change in the great and relevant aspects of society such as risk reduction, the discovery of new routes to expand trade and allow globalization along with development. It has also boosted economic activity as a unit, giving relevance to the formation of the nation-state that has generated a global order, as well as allowing the expansion and integration of countries under agencies responsible for their control and regulation.
References
Acosta, J. d. (2000). Lights and Shadows of Globalization. Bogotá: Comillas Pontifical University.
Bastiaensen, J. (2015). Development routes in human territories. Managua: UCA Publications.
Cáceres, R. (2001). Slavery routes in Africa and Latin America. Costa Rica: University of Costa Ric.
Canclini, N. (1999). Imagined Globalization. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Cannizaro, E. (2013). The European Union as an Actor in International Relations. Belin.
Habermas, J. (1999). The European nation-state and the pressures of globalization. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, 122.
Hausberger, B. (2018). Early globalization. Mexico City: The College of Mexico, A.C.
Hill, C. (2004). International Relations and the European Union. Oxford.
Koskenniemi, M. (1998). International Law Aspects of the European Union. Springer.
McMahon, R. (2009). The war cold a brief introduction. The pocket book, Historia Alianza editorial, 7.
Ohmae, K. (1997). The end of the nation state, the rise of regional economies. Santiago de Chile: Andres Bello.
Rauls, J. (2003). Cosmopolitanism, nation-state and minority nationalism. A critical review of recent literature. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Sanahuja, M. (1999). The international system of development cooperation. Madrid: CIDEAL.
Vélez, J. C. (2013). Globalization in international relations: International actors and the contemporary international system. Magazine of the Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, 625-654.
Villa, C. (2012). State, international wars and political ideas in Latin America. Bogotá: National University of Colombia.
